Evangelical Hypocrisy? 

Up to individuals to do those things, and they used to do them on their own accord via local, private organizations where they could literally watch their contributions go to good causes.

But ever since the PUBLIC institution (Government, in the classic model of a “society”) noticeably began to encroach and erode the structure of the four PRIVATE institutions (Family, Faith, Education, Economy), Americans got lazy. Government has enabled individuals to rely on the political bureaucracies to fill in the gaps. Unfortunately, The Man cannot effectively replace a second parent, a higher power, a locally-appropriate education, or a free market.

People support Trump not because they approve of or condone his severe moral faults, but because he promised changes that would lead to restoring individual responsibility and personal accountability.

America still has a fountain of people with those traditional moral values, and they’ll continue to practice what they preach if we just stop chastising and bullying them into seclusion. The more a government forces individuals to do certain things or behave a certain way — even when those things seem virtuous — the more they will lose touch with the inherent reason to do them. They will become resentful, and they will no longer do them; they will rely on the rest of the population to cover for them.

Outrage as MSNBC guest Christina Greer dismisses Mollie Tibbetts | Daily Mail Online

Christina Greer (pictured) apologized after her ‘flippant’ comments about murdered Iowa student, Mollie Tibbetts that agitated viewers by seemingly playing down the murder.

Source: Outrage as MSNBC guest Christina Greer dismisses Mollie Tibbetts | Daily Mail Online

SPOILER ALERT: This REALLY pisses me off.

This comment by #ChristinaGreer is FUCKING OUTRAGEOUS. I don’t expect MS-NBC as a news corporation to fire her, nor do I want them to. But I want all of my friends who do not see hers as a remark symptomatic to the decline of our country TO HEAR ME OUT and UNDERSTAND something.

CARELESS and FLIPPANT remarks like Ms Greer’s are EXACTLY what got this president elected.

Continue reading “Outrage as MSNBC guest Christina Greer dismisses Mollie Tibbetts | Daily Mail Online”

How to Escape Your Political Bubble for a Clearer View

The New York Times :: Critic’s Notebook

Love this! Totally going to try a couple of these today.

Of course i disagree with the perspective that it is the Trump supporters who live in a bubble, considering the expansive sea of red on the electoral map, plopped with a few densely populated blue bubbles areas. (Also that rural Trump supporters are more likely to get their news from traditional media rather than from social media.)

Continue reading “How to Escape Your Political Bubble for a Clearer View”

Press Pass REVOKED

Among other reasons, CNN was banned today for their story headlined, “FBI Refused White House Request to Knock Down Recent Trump-Russia Stories.”

Picture this.

Based on this headline and most of the article, you would believe that Chief of Staff Reince Priebus ran to the FBI and begged them for help in standing up for Trump. I bet this is what you, the reader, picture in your mind, because that’s the picture the mainstream media paint.

But in the article, in the second paragraph, the writer slips in an understated detail of the story:
Continue reading “Press Pass REVOKED”

Protections or Regulations

We’ll be hearing the term “protections” used more in the media as a strategic buzzword to replace “regulations,” depending on which term is more favorable to the medium’s editorial perspective. 

For right-leaning media, Trump will affect (call for/change/repeal) REGULATIONS to PROTECT (liberate) a broader swath of Americans, even if it means the disenfranchised may experience a negative impact.

For left-leaning media, Trump will affect (call for/change/repeal) PROTECTIONS for the traditional Democratic constituency, humanizing the action and focusing on the impact it will have on the disenfranchised.

This wordsmithing will be especially noticeably as Trump repeals and replaces protections at the beginning of his presidency – protections that were probably called regulations when Obama signed them. 

Be aware of this distinction if you want to impart a subtle inference in your political statement, or if you are trying to determine media bias. 

Trump’s Travel Expenses.

Over the last couple days, Facebook has seen a flurry of activity regarding reports of how Trump’s lavish lifestyle is costing American taxpayers yuge amounts of money, big league. Although Trump has yet to submit his official White_House_T-and-E_Reimbursement_Spreadsheet.xlsx for month-ending January, 2017, journalists writers have pulled records from previous presidential jaunts to estimate what Trump’s “Cost of Doing Business” is. 

image

Causing more than a few rug burns are: President Trump’s frequent “vacations” to Mar-a-Lago, these bratty Trump kids partying all over the world, and how thinly the Secret Service must spread itself to accommodate family members’ decisions to live all over the kingdom America.  

Here are the considerations I feel are missing from the mainstream assessment:

  1. Trump isn’t actually taking "vacations.” As I always had to explain to my employees and my parents: just because I’m not in the office, does not mean I’m not working. Trump is famous for being a workaholic, like Thomas Edison, Oprah Winfrey and Bill Gates, and he only sleeps 4-5 hours a night. I know I need a frequent change of scenery to keep my focus on point, I think it’s the same with The Donald.
  2. Trump felt he was fine with his own airplane and his loyal, private security detail, but Air Force One and the Secret Service is a matter of standard national security. The cost of protecting all his family members IS high, though, but also standard protocol for every president. It would not be fair to judge this family differently than other First Families. Would it help to know that the Trump Kids do not want 24/7 Secret Service? They already plan to drop the protection as soon as possible.
  3. Obama’s vacation spending of nearly $100MM in travel, accommodations and expenses throughout his presidency is for ACTUAL vacation time. Granted, a president doesn’t really get "time off” in terms of his responsibilities, but for Obama and his family, it WAS vacation in terms of time off from day-to-day oval office bureaucracy. NOTE: I am not criticizing Obama at all. The man worked hard, and I have no problem with his vacationing… except maybe I’m jealous that he didn’t invite me. 
  4. Back to Trump, he hasn’t taken a traditional vacation yet,nor does he plan to. He has flown to Mar-a-Lago to do business. (One of these weekends in question was to host the Japanese PM and his wife, Mrs Japanese PM.) Yes, these trips to Mar-a-Lago cost taxpayer money, and they raise legitimate security concerns. However, I sincerely doubt the costs of these trips include any accommodations or expenses. (I have no evidence of that statement, but if anyone knows or thinks otherwise, leave a comment below. ) 
  5. Trump famously declined the presidential salary. Not sure about Pence. Trump has said about his cabinet picks: “These people have given up fortunes of income in order to make $1 a year, and they’re so proud to do it.“ So far, only Trump has said he will decline his presidential salary, and it is unclear whether some of his Cabinet members will do the same. I’m sure that once all the members are confirmed, sworn in and settled down, there will be a Team Meeting and Big Announcement. 
  6. Melania plans to move to the White House at the end of Barron’s school year. Same parental reasoning the Dems believe Obama is staying in DC.
  7. Since when do Democrats care about spending?

UPDATE 

During a previous administration, the media wrote nice articles that seemed to justify Presidential vacations. 

Here’s why my posts may offend you.

I struggle with everything I post, knowing that 90% will read it incorrectly and use it against me. I’m a registered Independent. I’m conservative on many things, liberal on others. Sue me. But all my posts boil down to a couple basic premises:

I believe firmly that all media is biased, and that mainstream media is biased left.

This includes CNN, MSNBC, the major networks, and all major newspapers. FOX, of course, is biased to the right. Say what you will about FOX, and I’ll probably agree with you, but the big difference is that FOX takes full responsibility for their bias. I respect that, and simply wish that mainstream media would own up to their bias. I pass no judgement in either case because America needs options and different perspectives. But the mere fact that mainstream media refuses to admit and embrace their bias, and because so many viewers do not take the opportunity to learn other perspectives, I simply do not trust mainstream media.

Therefore, many of my posts are solely to point out media bias and double standards.

I hate Facebook memes containing lists of things pro or con, and I will usually play devil’s advocate.

I’ve liked, shared and commented on the fairness of memes regardless of political, social or cultural perspective.

For example, the meme of a quote from Donald Trump about running as a Republican because Republicans are stupid… That quote is widely circulated, but also widely known to be false. Although it is COMPLETELY believable, it is false. And to share the meme, knowing it is false, is so uncool, when there are SO MANY other great and truthful memes of ridiculous but accurate Trump quotes.

If and when I see a meme that is unfair, or contains information that I know to be false, I comment. Just ask Aj Pittman-Robertson or Edith Giles or Toy Battle. I love and respect them more than they know. They post a lot of great content, so I troll their accounts. 😉 And I know they’re sick of my comments.

It’s a bad habit, but if my timeline is full of bad information, and the person doesn’t know it’s bad information, I’m going to comment, because that’s what friends do. Opinion is one thing, but factual information is another thing.

The memes I have a hard time passing up are the ones of lists of statistics that don’t show a complete picture. I take full responsibility for being the jerk who drops a comment that explains how data can be expressed in all kinds of ways to prove a point, even if the data is expressed incorrectly.

Still, there are lots of funny political, and those are okay. Everyone should be able to laugh at themselves.

I’m staunchly anti-Hillary.

I’ve never liked her, not since her husband was president. I try to be fair when discussing her, but I still think she is corrupt and will be bad for America. Regarding her email scandal, I agree that 100 emails or of 30,000 are not enough to convict her.

(The percentage of emails found to contain classified information out of all of her email is mathematically the same as the number of guns used to kill people versus how many guns are in US circulation.)

So the FBI found 100 or so emails, and that’s not enough to convict her. HOWEVER, having a private server IS. LYING about having a private server IS. Not turning over and actually DELETING thousands and thousands of pieces of email evidence IS. All of these periphery activities should be enough to make the American public take pause and be outraged, but it ISN’T, and THAT is scary.

So yes, many of my posts will be about sharing information that supports the notion that Hillary is bought and paid for, that she is NOT what this country needs, and that, in fact, she will make it WORSE. She lies, she cheats, she operates above the law and consistently skates by, and she is greedy beyond measure.

I’m NOT pro-Trump.

I’m anti-Hillary (see No.3 above) and so I guess that results in pro-Trump by default. I admit when he first announced his candidacy that I was kinda stoked, because I’ve always wanted a non-politician to run. And I was a fan of The Apprentice for the first 5-6 seasons or so. But for all kinds of reasons – many the same as most people, many others different – I’m not pro-Trump. I’ll be truly conflicted come voting time if all things stay the same. But I will NOT vote for Hillary.

That said, I feel there is a lot of misinformation out there about Trump because of media bias. (See No. 1 above.) Too much detail to go into now, but the mainstream media has always relentlessly attacked conservatives yet coddled liberals. As an Independent, the lack of objective journalism bothers me, and it pushes me further and further right of center.

An example here is that Trump has NEVER said he hates immigrants, or that he would deport immigrants. Yet the media and pundits and talking heads CONTINUOUSLY quote him as such, and perpetuate this so-called “fear-mongering” when it’s THE MEDIA that is mongering the fear!

I try to live firmly, daily, by Stephen Covey’s first habit: “Seek first to understand, THEN to be understood.”

And I expect others to do the same.

I almost always try to ask questions rather than make statements. I’m a human being, always trying to learn and to challenge myself. Seeing or experiencing different perspectives gets me high. I LOVE talking about things and finding out what makes others tick. I LOVE the challenge of understanding why people think the things they do. Most of all, I LOVE learning about others’ perspectives, because I might agree and adopt that perspective as well.

On the flip side, this means I might appear to contradict myself. I actually might, but more often than not, I’ve found I can justify what might be an irrational discrepancy. Please confront me on that! Being consistent is incredibly important to me. Being fair and adopting the same, hopefully objective lens is also very important to me.

Anyway, there are probably five more things I could add, but I’ll save those for another post.

Congratulations if you got this far.